Jqg said: But a lot? So much that it's not worth it? I don't mind not being too dominant as long as it's not excessive. Thanks Expand
Unfortunately it is a lot, but you can still dominate with strikers and wingers, just not as much as without them. Pick any tactic you like from the top and change the shadow strikers to IP: CHF / OoP: CFD, and it will probably work.
Middleweight165 said: For example if I wanted to manage the team who is predicted to finish midtable, would I be able to use the Win% and Pts from the tactics testing table to choose a tactic that would have that team finish around mid table? Expand
There is a green arrow with "Win" that represents the % of points.
Jqg said: Hi, I don't quite understand these versions. Is it like a minor tweak that improves everything? But you don't have a lighter version like 0.26, right? Can I use this one and then switch to the other one if I'm winning by 3 goals? Thanks, and sorry for my bad English.
I mean, for example, does version 0.36 mean it's better than 0.26? Expand
This one got worse results than 0.26, so I assumed there is no need to add light version.
Jqg said: Hi, thanks for the tactics. Should we follow the coaching staff's recommendations to pressure X player, tackle X player harder, etc.? Or is it better to leave that blank? Thanks Expand
Unfortunately it is a lot, but you can still dominate with strikers and wingers, just not as much as without them. Pick any tactic you like from the top and change the shadow strikers to IP: CHF / OoP: CFD, and it will probably work.
It was tested. Unfortunately, strikers are worse in the new patch.
There is a green arrow with "Win" that represents the % of points.
When 26.1 starts being tested.
I mean, for example, does version 0.36 mean it's better than 0.26?
This one got worse results than 0.26, so I assumed there is no need to add light version.
Personally I just ignore them.
Thanks! There are some better tactics out there, though.